LE FIGARO. – In announcing this summer by Accor of making the study of a split between the hotel and the services you have expressed your reservations about the form, if not in substance. Over three months later, did you stop your position on this?
Gilles Michel. – The question was raised shortly after the transfer of the participation of the Deposit to the ISP. In this context, we should play our role as shareholder, albeit a minority 7.5% stake, but still full. This meant that we have all of the elements to make a serious analysis. This has justified my "fit of temper" at the time. Since then, extensive work has taken place on the reasons to justify this decision on the benefits, costs and risks of this option and its alternatives, which I welcome.And quite frankly, I've seen all this work, no evidence for the need, in December 2009 to initiate division of Accor.
So you keep on your positions?
I have no reason in the name of a doctrine or principles. The split may be a modality in the service of a project but not an end in itself. During the work, we found that both businesses had before him genuine opportunities for strengthening the ISP calls for. But it is possible to pursue a development strategy in the current framework. Conversely, a split in a market environment that is not without risk, I think exposing every business to increased vulnerability.It is not necessary to incur the risk of executing the operation, financial risks, particularly in terms of ratings of each entity, and the risk of weakening as it can lead an ambitious strategy in the context present.
What is your alternative to Accor?
Accor is a large group of ACC 40. It can lead a strong offensive strategy with determination and speed. Its direction can be bold in terms of both organic growth and external growth.
Do you think the council will follow? And if this is not the case, what will the ISP?
I do not prejudge the discussion board. Each director will determine in its soul and conscience under the sole interest of social enterprise. And if, purely hypothetically, the board should choose the path of division, the next step will be the General Assembly, where of course we would vote against.But I am perfectly aware of the laws of arithmetic. The two shareholders who hold 30% stake in Accor worn since the beginning of the project, saying it is not up to cash in the short term but to create value over time. I do not doubt that they have at heart to remain associated for several years in the capital of each of the two new companies. With regard to the ISP, I would have full discretion as to our involvement.
A council held Tuesday decisive
Accor has accelerated the study of the relevance of a split (with a later check services prepaid and other hotels). The group meets Tuesday Board of Directors, expected to be decisive on the issue.Mid-November, after its previous meeting, the council had said "satisfied with the progress of work" to formalize the project.
The fund Colony Capital and investment company Eurazeo, who own about 30% stake in Accor, there are the best way to enhance their investment. Gilles Pelisson, CEO of the group agreed with this idea. However, the ISP, the second largest shareholder with 7.5% stake, otherwise, officially now. In this context, the position of the six independent directors will be decisive. Unions are worried themselves for employment in hotels.
A study of CA Chevreux, hotels could represent 74% of sales for Accor this year, but only 39% of operating income.In case of division, according to the scheme proposed, the hotel would bring about one third of the group's debt, two thirds of returning to the emerging prepaid.
»COMPUTER GRAPHICS – Investment ISP
The proposed division of Accor moves its shareholders